QRP Transceiver Comparison: QMX+ vs (tr)uSDX vs QMX vs QCX Family

Feature / CapabilityQRP Labs QMX+(tr)uSDXQRP Labs QMXQRP Labs QCX+ / QCX Mini
Frequency Coverage160–6 m (11 bands)Typically HF only (band-dependent)HF bands (variant-dependent)Single-band (HF)
Operating ModesCW, SSB, DigitalCW, SSB, DigitalCW, Digital (limited SSB)CW only
RF Output Power~3–5 W QRP~4–5 W QRP~3–5 W QRP~5 W QRP
Receiver ArchitectureEmbedded SDRSDR-basedSDR-basedDirect-conversion CW
USB Audio InterfaceYes (built-in sound card)YesLimited / optionalNo
CAT / Rig ControlUSB CAT (Hamlib-compatible)USB / serialUSB / serialNo CAT
SSB Voice OperationNative supportNative supportExperimental / limitedNot supported
Digital Mode IntegrationExcellent (WSJT-X, JS8Call, FT8)Very goodGoodExternal interfaces required
User InterfaceLCD, menu-drivenLCD + rotary encoderLCD-basedLCD + physical controls
Kit ComplexityModerate (SMT pre-installed)Moderate–high (varies by vendor)ModerateBeginner-friendly
Learning FocusAll-band, all-mode operationDSP & firmware experimentationMultiband digital QRPCW fundamentals & RF basics
PortabilityExcellent (field-ready)ExcellentExcellentExcellent
Typical Use CaseOne-radio QRP HF/6 m stationExperimenter / firmware hackerDigital-focused QRPDedicated CW ops
Community & DocsExtensive, well-maintainedLarge but fragmentedStrong QRP Labs supportVery strong CW community

Summary Interpretation

  • QMX+ is the most complete QRP solution in this group: multi-band, multi-mode, SDR-based, and USB-native.
  • (tr)uSDX excels as a platform for experimentation and open-source development, but quality and support vary by build.
  • QMX (non-plus) sits between QCX and QMX+—strong for digital/CW but less refined for voice.
  • QCX/QCX Mini remain best-in-class for learning CW and RF fundamentals, with outstanding receiver performance for their simplicity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *